4.6 Article

Economic shocks and infant health: Evidence from a trade reform in Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103193

关键词

Trade liberalization; Economic shocks; Infant mortality; Public health policy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using data from over 3,000 Brazilian municipalities over 25 years, the study investigates the impact of trade liberalization on infant mortality. The findings suggest that areas with greater exposure to trade-induced economic shock experienced a larger decline in infant mortality. The decrease in female employment rates and increased use of basic health services among women of childbearing ages and infants were identified as the main mechanisms behind this effect. The introduction of community-based health interventions also helped lower the mortality rate.
Using a uniquely rich set of data sources spanning more than 3,000 Brazilian municipalities over a horizon of 25 years, we investigate the effects of changes in local economic conditions generated by a trade liberalization reform on infant mortality. We exploit variation in import tariff reductions, together with differences in the baseline industry composition across locations, for identification. We find that areas with greater exposure to the trade-induced economic shock experienced a larger decline in infant mortality. In our exploration of mechanisms, we find the most support for the hypothesis that worse labor market opportunities make it less costly undertake health-improving behaviors that are time intensive. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observe a significant decline in female employment rates and an increase in the use of basic health services among women of childbearing ages and infants. We also document that the rollout of a community-based intervention that brings basic health services to the home in a flexible fashion lowers the magnitude of the mortality effect, providing further evidence in favor of the parental time mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据