3.8 Article

Bayesian estimation of realized GARCH-type models with application to financial tail risk management

期刊

ECONOMETRICS AND STATISTICS
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 30-46

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2021.03.006

关键词

Expected shortfall; Forecasting; Heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model; Markov chain Monte Carlo method; Realized volatility; Value-at-Risk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in various GARCH models have effectively accounted for biases in realized volatility and have been extended to nonlinear or long-term memory patterns. These models demonstrate potential in quantile forecasts of financial returns and volatility forecasting.
Advances in the various realized GARCH models have proven effective in taking account of the bias in realized volatility (RV) introduced by microstructure noise and non-trading hours. They have been extended into nonlinear or long-memory patterns, including the realized exponential GARCH (EGARCH), realized heterogeneous autoregressive GARCH (HARGARCH), and realized threshold GARCH (TGARCH) models. These models with skew Student's t-distribution are applied to quantile forecasts such as Value-at-Risk and expected shortfall of financial returns as well as volatility forecasting. Parameter estimation and quantile forecasting are built on Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling methods. Backtesting measures are presented for both Value-at-Risk and expected shortfall forecasts and employ two loss functions to assess volatility forecasts. Results taken from the S&P500 in the U.S. market with approximately 5-year out-of-sample periods covering the COVID19 pandemic period are reported as follows: (1) The realized HAR-GARCH model performs best in respect of violation rates and expected shortfall at the 1% and 5% significance levels. (2) The realized EGARCH model performs best with regard to volatility forecasts. (c) 2021 EcoSta Econometrics and Statistics. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据