4.7 Article

A tri-individual iterated greedy algorithm for the distributed hybrid flow shop with blocking

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121667

关键词

Distributed hybrid flow shop scheduling; problems; Blocking; Diversified iterated greedy algorithm; Active decoding; Heuristics; Problem-specific knowledge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article studies a distributed hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with blocking constraints and proposes an algorithm based on its characteristics. By designing an active decoding strategy, a framework of multiple iterative solutions, a heuristic rule based on blocking constraint, and an insertion-based search strategy, the goal of optimizing scheduling is achieved.
Scheduling problem with blocking is an attractive research direction due to its wide practical applications. However, in the distributed hybrid flow shop problem (DHFSP), there are few studies on blocking constraints. In this article, we study a distributed hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with blocking constraints (DBHFSP), where the goal is to minimize the maximum completion time, and propose a tri-individual iterated greedy (TIG) algorithm based on the characteristics of the DBHFSP. First, an active decoding strategy is designed to reduce the idle time of machines. Afterward, a framework of multiple iterative solutions is designed to enhance the diversity of the solutions, in which the multiple solutions are generated through a neighborhood search. Then, a heuristic rule based on blocking constraint is proposed to generate promising initial solutions. In addition, an insertionbased search strategy based on rotating critical factories is designed to accelerate the convergence speed of the TIG algorithm. Finally, the proposed algorithm is compared with state-of-the-art algorithms and classical intelligent optimization algorithms. The experimental results show that the TIG algorithm is superior to the comparison algorithm in solving the DBHFSP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据