4.5 Article

Stroke lesion size - Still a useful biomarker for stroke severity and outcome in times of high-dimensional models

期刊

NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103511

关键词

Lesion volume; Outcome prediction; Machine learning; NIHSS; mRS; Sample size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lesion size is a decent biomarker for stroke outcome and severity, slightly inferior to spatial lesion features but particularly suited in studies with small samples.
Background: The volumetric size of a brain lesion is a frequently used stroke biomarker. It stands out among most imaging biomarkers for being a one-dimensional variable that is applicable in simple statistical models. In times of machine learning algorithms, the question arises of whether such a simple variable is still useful, or whether high-dimensional models on spatial lesion information are superior.Methods: We included 753 first-ever anterior circulation ischemic stroke patients (age 68.4 +/- 15.2 years; NIHSS at 24 h 4.4 +/- 5.1; modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3-months median[IQR] 1[0.75;3]) and traced lesions on diffusion -weighted MRI. In an out-of-sample model validation scheme, we predicted stroke severity as measured by NIHSS 24 h and functional stroke outcome as measured by mRS at 3 months either from spatial lesion features or lesion size.Results: For stroke severity, the best regression model based on lesion size performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with R-2 = 0.322, but models with spatial lesion features performed significantly better with R-2 = 0.363 (t(7 5 2) = 2.889; p = 0.004). For stroke outcome, the best classification model based on lesion size again performed significantly above chance (p < 0.0001) with an accuracy of 62.8%, which was not different from the best model with spatial lesion features (62.6%, p = 0.80). With smaller training data sets of only 150 or 50 patients, the performance of high-dimensional models with spatial lesion features decreased up to the point of being equivalent or even inferior to models trained on lesion size. The combination of lesion size and spatial lesion features in one model did not improve predictions.Conclusions: Lesion size is a decent biomarker for stroke outcome and severity that is slightly inferior to spatial lesion features but is particularly suited in studies with small samples. When low-dimensional models are desired, lesion size provides a viable proxy biomarker for spatial lesion features, whereas high-precision prediction models in personalised prognostic medicine should operate with high-dimensional spatial imaging features in large samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据