4.2 Article

Unveiling Oil Seed Cakes Ability to Suppress Fusarium Wilt (Fusarium udum Butler) in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.)

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 790-796

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbmb.2023.2319

关键词

Copyright: American Scientific Publishers; Pigeonpea; Fusarium Udum; Oil Seed Cakes; Management; Wilt.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pigeonpea is a versatile crop with significant economic importance. Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium udum is a major economic threat to pigeonpea growers, but the study found that the use of neem cake effectively suppressed the disease and improved the growth and root-nodule count of pigeonpea.
Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) holds significant economic importance as a versatile crop due to its various uses. It is a valuable source of nutrition for human consumption, rich in protein, dietary fiber, vitamins and minerals. Additionally, pigeonpea plays a crucial role in sustainable agriculture by fixing atmospheric nitrogen and enhancing soil fertility. Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium udum is an important economic threat to the growers of pigeonpea in India and across the globe. The study was therefore conducted during the years 2017-2019 to determine the impact of the various oil seed cakes on the fusarium wilt of pigeonpea. Seven treatments including different types of oil seed and carbendazim (treated check) were employed by adopting the soil inoculation method. All of the treatments employed notably diminished the incidence of fusarium wilt. Among the treatments, neem cake (T2) was most effective in suppressing disease incidence (73.78% and 76.89%), registering the least plant fatalities (19.05 and 18.02), respectively. Furthermore, treatment (T2) also showed maximum plant height at 120 DAS (151.86 cm and 153.34 cm) and the highest root-nodules count of pigeon pea (5.71, 5.66) respectively in both the cropping years compared to other treatments and untreated control (T0).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据