4.2 Article

How do we decide what to do? Resting-state connectivity patterns and components of self-generated thought linked to the development of more concrete personal goals

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 236, 期 9, 页码 2469-2481

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4729-y

关键词

Mind-wandering; Goals; Future thought; Hippocampus

资金

  1. John Templeton Foundation
  2. US Office of Education [R305A110277]
  3. BBSRC [BB/J006963/1]
  4. European Research Council [SEMBIND 283530]
  5. Wellcome Trust [103817/Z/14/Z]
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-57840, MOP-123520]
  7. CIHR Postdoctoral Fellowship
  8. Wellcome Trust [103817/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  9. BBSRC [BB/J006963/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J006963/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human cognition is not limited to the available environmental input but can consider realities that are different to the here and now. We describe the cognitive states and neural processes linked to the refinement of descriptions of personal goals. When personal goals became concrete, participants reported greater thoughts about the self and the future during mind-wandering. This pattern was not observed for descriptions of TV programmes. Connectivity analysis of participants who underwent a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed neural traits associated with this pattern. Strong hippocampal connectivity with ventromedial pre-frontal cortex was common to better-specified descriptions of goals and TV programmes, while connectivity between hippocampus and the pre-supplementary motor area was associated with individuals whose goals were initially abstract but became more concrete over the course of the experiment. We conclude that self-generated cognition that arises during the mind-wandering state can allow goals to be refined, and this depends on neural systems anchored in the hippocampus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据