4.6 Article

A ratiometric SERS sensor with one signal probe for ultrasensitive and quantitative monitoring of serum xanthine

期刊

ANALYST
卷 148, 期 22, 页码 5707-5713

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3an01245j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a sensitive, simple, and reliable approach for measuring xanthine in biological liquids was developed using a ratiometric surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) sensing strategy. By measuring the ratio of specific Raman peaks, the xanthine concentration could be quantitatively detected. This novel sensor showed high sensitivity and reliability, providing a new direction for the analysis of other biomolecules.
Xanthine can be converted into uric acid, and a high concentration of xanthine in the human body can cause many diseases. Therefore, it is important to develop a sensitive, simple, and reliable approach for measuring xanthine in biological liquids. Hence, a ratiometric surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) sensing strategy with one signal probe was exploited for reliable, sensitive, and quantitative monitoring of serum xanthine. 3-Mercaptophenylboronic acid (3-MPBA) was used as a typical reference with a Raman peak at 996 cm(-1). First, 3-MPBA was bound to gold nanoflowers@silica (GNFs@Si) through Au-S bonds. Xanthine oxidase (XOD) catalyzed the oxidation of xanthine into H2O2 on GNFs@Si. Afterward, the obtained H2O2 further reduced 3-MPBA to 3-hydroxythiophenol (3-HTP) accompanied by the emergence of a new Raman peak at 883 cm-1. Meanwhile, the Raman intensity at 996 cm(-1) remained constant. Therefore, the ratio of I-883/I-996 increased with the increasing of xanthine concentration, thus realizing quantitative detection of xanthine. As a result, a ratiometric SERS sensor for the detection of xanthine was proposed with a detection limit of 5.7 nM for xanthine. The novel ratiometric SERS sensor provides a new direction for analyzing other biomolecules with high sensitivity and reliability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据