4.6 Article

Au-modified α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for ultrasensitive isopropanol detection

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 43, 页码 20000-20009

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nj03533f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Au/α-Fe2O3 composite sensors were prepared and exhibited high selectivity and response for isopropanol detection. Especially, the sample with an Au-modified concentration of 7 mol% showed the best performance with a response to 100 ppm isopropanol that was 4.5 times higher than that of pure α-Fe2O3.
As a typical VOC gas, the harm of isopropanol to human health and the environment cannot be ignored. The detection of isopropanol is of great significance to human safety and environmental protection. Herein, Au/alpha-Fe2O3 sensors with different Au contents were prepared for isopropanol detection using a simple microwave-assisted method. The morphology, structure, and composition of the samples were characterized using SEM, TEM, XRD, and XPS. The gas-sensitive properties of pure alpha-Fe2O3 and Au/alpha-Fe2O3 composites were systematically investigated under different temperatures. It was found that the Au/alpha-Fe2O3 composite (AF) sensors exhibited excellent selectivity and a high response to isopropanol at an optimal operating temperature of 220 degrees C. The gas-sensing performances of the Au-modified alpha-Fe2O3 nanoparticles were significantly improved compared to that of pristine alpha-Fe2O3. Especially, the sample with the Au-modified concentration of 7 mol% exhibited the highest response of 51.47 to 100 ppm isopropanol, which was 4.5 times higher than that of pure alpha-Fe2O3. Moreover, the AF gas sensor displayed great selectivity, reusability, and long-term stability. The enhancement of the gas-sensing performances of the AF composite gas sensors can be attributed to the effects of electronic sensitization and chemical sensitization induced by the introduction of Au nanoparticles, providing a viable solution for detecting isopropanol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据