4.8 Article

Regulating and identifying the structures of PdAu alloys with splendid oxygen reduction activity for rechargeable zinc-air batteries

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ee02719h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alloying can improve catalytic performance by inducing ensemble and ligand effects. This study investigates the structural differences in PdxAuy alloys and demonstrates the impact of these differences on the oxygen reduction reaction activity. The optimized PdxAuy catalyst shows enhanced reaction kinetics and higher mass activity compared to commercial Pt/C.
Alloying improves catalytic performance, but the control is challenging due to element contributions. Here, we study the structural differences in PdxAuy alloys to understand their impact on the oxygen reduction reaction activity. Spectroscopic and theoretical analyses reveal ensemble and ligand effects induced by alloying. We observe that active adjacent Pd sites become inactive isolated Pd sites upon dilution with Au due to the ensemble effect. As the Au proportion increases, the Pd d-band is progressively filled due to charge hybridization from the ligand effect. The optimized coordinate and electronic structures result in reduced energy barriers and enhanced reaction kinetics in PdxAuy catalysts. Remarkably, the optimal Pd55Au45 catalyst achieves a mass activity of 962.59 A gPd-1 at 0.9 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode, approximately 15 times higher than that of commercial 20 wt% Pt/C. Zn-air batteries with a Pd55Au45 cathode exhibit remarkable specific capacity and 2000 hour stability. This study provides valuable insights into the rational regulation and catalytic chemistry of alloys. PdxAuy alloys with gradient elemental ratios are demonstrated to understand the synergism of the ensemble and ligand effects in catalyzing the ORR. This study provides valuable insights into the rational regulation and catalytic chemistry of alloys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据