4.3 Article

MFCSNet: A Musician-Follower Complex Social Network for Measuring Musical Influence

期刊

ENTERTAINMENT COMPUTING
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcom.2023.100601

关键词

Complex social network; Scale-free network; Community detection; Cluster analysis; Isolation forest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a model named MFCSNet is proposed to measure musical influence by analyzing musical characteristics and connections between music influencers and followers. The model applies multiple indicators, providing diverse analysis perspectives and accurately reflecting the influence of different types of music in various fields.
Music, a significant and exquisite part of human culture, owns abundant features and enjoys a long-standing history. Music evolves in society over time, while artists' music gets influenced by personal experiences, external events, and inspirations from predecessors. In this paper, we propose a model named MFCSNet that measures musical influence by utilizing the data sets of musical characteristics and links between music influencers and followers. MFCSNet applies multiple indicators and has more analysis perspectives, and well reflects the influence of different kinds of music in various fields. Firstly, we analyze the influencer- follower relations by looking at the network of musical influence, observing the correlation between followers and influencers, and closely examining several sub-networks extracted from the entire network. Secondly, we propose measures that quantify the similarities within and between musical genres, using musical characteristics, such as danceability, energy, and valence, in order to measure the influence between artists and find the more influential characteristics. Furthermore, we apply MFCSNet on the whole timeline to analyze the evolutions and revolutions of music through time, with the goal of revealing the relation between music and culture, society, politics, and technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据