4.4 Article

Free Vibration and Buckling Analysis of Axially Loaded Double-Beam Systems with Generalized Boundary Conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS
卷 149, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/JENMDT.EMENG-7216

关键词

Double-beam system; Free vibration; Critical buckling load; Generalized boundary conditions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, free vibration and buckling of an axially loaded double-beam system with generalized boundary conditions were analytically studied using the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory.
Double-beam systems have found many applications in civil and mechanical engineering. Extensive works of research have been conducted on the investigation of double-beam systems in which some have studied the vibration characteristics of general double-beam systems without considering the effect of axial load, whereas others investigated the vibration and buckling of axially loaded double-beam systems with classical boundary conditions. A few previous studies have considered a general axially loaded double-beam system, but none of them have provided a general solution to calculate the critical buckling load of the system with arbitrary boundary conditions. In the present study, free vibration and buckling of an axially loaded double-beam system, which was composed of two nonidentical beams with generalized boundary conditions, were analytically studied by using the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. A semianalytical method was proposed to calculate the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the system, and an explicit formula was derived to determine the critical buckling load of the system. Parametric investigations were performed to study the influences of the connecting stiffness of the interlayer and axial loads on the dynamic characteristics and critical buckling load of the system. Results show that the proposed method can be used for free vibration and buckling analyses of generalized double-beam systems subjected to axial loads.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据