4.7 Article

Synthesis of Cu-Al layered double hydroxides from aluminum saline slags

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108413

关键词

Layered double hydroxides; Hydrotalcite; Copper; Jahn-Teller effect; Aluminum saline slag; Industrial waste

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports for the first time the use of saline slag, a hazardous waste generated during aluminum recycling, as an aluminum source for the synthesis of CuAl layered double hydroxides (LDH). The synthesis pH was found to have a significant effect on the nature of secondary phases, as well as the structure and morphology of the samples.
The use of saline slag, a hazardous waste generated during the recycling of aluminum, as aluminum source for the synthesis CuAl layered double hydroxides (LDH) is for the first time reported in this study. Due to the JahnTeller effect, divalent copper-aluminum LDH come usually with impurities and a pure CuAl LDH is not easy to obtain. The effect of synthesis pH has been examined by comparing LDH synthesized at various pH, ranging from 6 to 12 via a co-precipitation method using aluminum obtained from an alkaline extraction of the slag. For comparison purposes, a sample was synthesized at pH = 9 using commercial aluminum Al(NO3)3 & sdot;9H2O instead of extracted aluminum. The effects of the aging time and calcination temperature are also discussed. The LDH and their calcined metal mixed oxide (layered double oxide, LDO) have been analyzed with several characterization techniques: powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), N2 adsorption at -196 degrees C, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), temperature programmed reduction (TPR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (TEM and EDS). Synthesis pH has been proved not only to have a significant effect on the nature of secondary phases but also on the structure and morphology of the samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据