4.7 Article

Fabrication of novel fluorene incorporated conjugated microporous polymer nanotubes for visible-light CO2 reduction with water vapor

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 14, 期 40, 页码 4679-4684

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3py00493g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous organic polymers with nanotube structures were prepared and studied as photocatalysts for CO2 conversion. The unique nanotube structure provides a larger surface area for active site exposure and CO2 adsorption. By replacing specific units, the photocatalytic performance was further enhanced. The nanotube catalysts showed higher CO formation rates.
Porous organic polymers have recently attracted great interest as desirable candidates for the solar-driven conversion of CO(2 )molecules to hydrocarbon fuels. However, the interfacial reaction efficiency of polymer photocatalysts is severely suppressed by the limited active sites due to their bulk microstructures. In this work, we report the facile preparation of two nanotube-like photocatalysts on the base of fluorene (Flu) incorporated conjugated microporous polymers by the template-free Sonogashira coupling reaction. The unique nanotube structure endows polymers with surface areas of 450-861 m(2) g(-1), which favors the exposure of active sites and adsorption of CO2 molecules. By replacing the 1,3,5-triethynylbenzene (TEB) core with a 1,3,5-tris(4-ethynylphenyl)benzene (TPB) unit in the polymer backbone, TPB-Flu shows simultaneously reduced optical band gaps, enhanced CO2 uptake and improved charge migration compared with TEB-Flu due to the extended pi-conjugation. As a result, under irradiation with visible light (>420 nm), TPB-Flu nanotubes deliver an impressive CO formation rate of 83.1 mu mol h(-1) g(-1), which is more than 2 fold higher than that of TEB-Flu (40.4 mu mol h(-1) g(-1)). This work paves the way for fabricating novel organic polymer nanotubes in combination with improving the charge migration and CO2 absorption towards the photoconversion of CO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据