4.7 Review

Multivariate metal-organic frameworks generated through post-synthetic modification: impact and future directions

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 52, 期 45, 页码 16578-16585

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3dt01936e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reticular chemistry has played a crucial role in the development of versatile metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and other structures, offering tailored porosity and enhanced properties. To overcome the limitations of traditional MOF synthesis, researchers have employed strategies to incorporate multiple ligands/metals into the crystal lattice, resulting in multi-variate (MTV) MOFs with improved functionalities.
Reticular chemistry has proven to be invaluable over time, thanks to the structural versatility, and tailored porosity observed in structures like metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent-organic frameworks (COFs), and metal-organic polyhedra (MOPs). Despite the wide array of ligands and metals available for synthesizing MOFs, they are still somewhat constrained by the reliance on de novo conditions and the focus on generating MOFs with single ligand and metal. To surpass these limitations, researchers have established strategies to generate multivariate (MTV) MOF structures incorporating more than one ligand/metal into the crystal lattice. MTV-MOFs have demonstrated enhanced properties by virtue of the additional functionalities incorporated within their structures. One approach to developing MTV-MOFs is through post-synthetic modification (PSM), where new functionalities are introduced after the initial synthesis, thereby achieving the enhanced properties of MTV-MOFs even in cases where the new functionalities are incompatible with MOF synthesis. Reticular chemistry has proven to be invaluable over time, thanks to the structural versatility, and tailored porosity observed in structures like metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), covalent-organic frameworks (COFs), and metal-organic polyhedra (MOPs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据