4.6 Review

An overview of the catalytic activity of MN4 molecular catalysts for the heterogeneous hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2023.101387

关键词

Hydrogen evolution reaction; Molecular electrocatalysts; Metalloporphyrins; Metallophthalocyanines; Metal corroles; Ligand electronic structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrocatalysis of the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) has been extensively studied on metal electrodes and alloys, particularly precious metals like Pt. However, recent research has focused on MN4-macrocyclic molecular HER catalysts to reduce the reliance on expensive Pt-based catalysts. These catalysts' activity can be modified by altering their molecular and electronic structures, and they can serve as models for the reaction. Many publications combine experiments and theory to analyze the influence of N4 ligands and the central metal on the electrocatalytic properties of these materials. The confinement of these catalysts on electrode surfaces is also discussed.
The electrocatalysis of the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) has been studied on metal electrodes and alloys for many years, mainly involving precious metals like Pt. The search for MN4-macrocyclic molecular HER catalysts is rather recent and pursues to reduce the dependence on expensive Pt-based catalysts. Some MN4 complexes are cost-effective and exhibit good activity, but many improvements are needed. Their activity can be modulated by changes in the molecular and electronic structure and can serve as models for this re-action. Many publications combine experiments and theory to quantify the influence of the N4 ligand and the central metal on the electrocatalytic properties of these materials. Their confinement on electrode surfaces is also described. In this review, we discuss the recent progress in this area and the factors that lead to high catalytic activity in terms of the mo-lecular structure of catalysts and the influence of the nature of the support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据