4.5 Article

Degradation of lignin and cellulose during foliar litter decomposition in an alpine forest river

期刊

ECOSPHERE
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1523

关键词

concentration; decomposition period; degradation rate; environmental factors; litter species

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270498, 31570445, 31500358]
  2. Doctoral Scientific Fund Project of the Ministry of Education of China [20135103110002]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201506910002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignin and cellulose are thought to be critical factors that affect the rate of litter decomposition; however, few data are available on their degradation dynamics during litter decomposition in lotic ecosystems, such as forest rivers, where litter can decompose much more rapidly than in terrestrial ecosystems. We studied the degradation of lignin and cellulose in the foliar litter of four dominant riparian species (willow: Salix paraplesia; azalea: Rhododendron lapponicum; cypress: Sabina saltuaria; and larch: Larix mastersiana) in an alpine forest river. Over an entire year's incubation, litter lignin and cellulose degraded by 14.7-100% and 57.7-100% of their initial masses, respectively, depending on litter species. Strong degradations of lignin and cellulose occurred in the prefreezing period (i.e., the first 41 d) during litter decomposition, and the degradation rate was the highest among all the decomposition periods regardless of litter species. Litter species, decomposition period, and environmental factors such as temperature and nutrient availability showed significant influences on lignin and cellulose degradation rates. Compared with previously reported data regarding the dynamics of lignin and cellulose during litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems, our results suggest that lignin and cellulose can be degraded much more rapidly in lotic ecosystems, indicating that the traditionally used two-phased model for the dynamics of lignin in decomposing litter may not be suitable in lotic ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据