4.7 Article

Relaxation-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis

期刊

STRUCTURAL SAFETY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102393

关键词

Importance sampling; Fragility analysis; Reliability analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an importance sampling formulation based on adaptively relaxing parameters, providing a unified framework for various existing variance reduction techniques and laying the foundation for creating new importance sampling strategies. It proposes two importance sampling strategies for low-dimensional and high-dimensional problems, which are crucial for fragility analysis in performance-based engineering.
This study presents an importance sampling formulation based on adaptively relaxing parameters from the indicator function and/or the probability density function. The formulation embodies the prevalent mathematical concept of relaxing a complex problem into a sequence of progressively easier sub-problems. Due to the flexibility in constructing relaxation parameters, relaxation-based importance sampling provides a unified framework for various existing variance reduction techniques, such as subset simulation, sequential importance sampling, and annealed importance sampling. More crucially, the framework lays the foundation for creating new importance sampling strategies, tailoring to specific applications. To demonstrate this potential, two importance sampling strategies are proposed. The first strategy couples annealed importance sampling with subset simulation, focusing on low-dimensional problems. The second strategy aims to solve high-dimensional problems by leveraging spherical sampling and scaling techniques. Both methods are desirable for fragility analysis in performance-based engineering, as they can produce the entire fragility surface in a single run of the sampling algorithm. Three numerical examples, including a 1000-dimensional stochastic dynamic problem, are studied to demonstrate the proposed methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据