4.4 Article

Intermittent working memory training during adulthood protects against age-related long-term spatial reference memory decline in rats

期刊

GEROSCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-023-00993-1

关键词

Aging; Delayed non-matching to position task; Recent memory; Remote memory; Water maze

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engagement in cognitive activity in adulthood is a key factor for successful cognitive aging. This study demonstrates that intermittent working memory training during adulthood can protect aged animals from the deleterious effects of aging on spatial reference memory.
Engagement in cognitive activity in adulthood is one of the factors that enable successful cognitive aging, both in humans and rodents. However, some studies emphasize that the beneficial effect on cognition of such an activity may reflect carry over from one test situation to another, including memory for procedural aspects of the behavioral tasks, and thus question whether this effect can be limited to the trained cognitive domain or whether it can be transferred to an untrained ones. In the current study, we assessed whether adulthood intermittent working memory training has beneficial effect on long-term memory of aged rats using two very different test situations. To this aim, rats trained in a delayed non-matching to position task in operant box at 3 and 15 months of age were tested in a place learning task in water maze when they were 24 months. The two tasks differ with regard to the cognitive domain but also in their spatial ability requirement and the nature of the reinforcer used. During the memory tests, accuracy of the platform search indicated age-related impairment only in the aged-untrained group. Thus, intermittent training during adult life in a task involving working memory protects aged animals from the deleterious effects of aging on spatial reference memory. This result highlights the long-term beneficial effects of training on a working memory task on an untrained cognitive domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据