4.7 Article

A lithium-ion battery equivalent circuit model based on a hybrid parametrization approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.109051

关键词

Equivalent circuit model (ECM); Lithium-ion battery; Electric vehicle; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved equivalent circuit model for lithium-ion batteries that can simulate the current-voltage characteristics under various operating conditions. The model takes into account the variations in state of charge, temperature, and charging-discharging current, and its effectiveness and feasibility have been experimentally verified.
This paper proposes an improved lithium-ion battery equivalent circuit model that can simulate the currentvoltage characteristics of the battery under various operating conditions. Specifically, a hybrid parametrization approach is adopted by combining the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and the hybrid pulse power characterization techniques for the identification and quantification of all loss contributions in a lithium-ion battery cell, for a wide operating frequency range. Moreover, the proposed equivalent circuit model considers the variation of the state of charge, the temperature and the charging-discharging current, and since it can be easily realized by utilizing the existing hardware for the cell equalization, it can be a useful tool for a wide range of real-time applications. The above are realized based on analytical equations of the battery performance with respect to the aforementioned operating parameters' variations. The effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed model is experimentally verified on a commercial, high energy capacity cylindrical lithium-ion battery cell of 3.25 Ah by comparing the model voltage performance with the real voltage of the cell during dynamic operating conditions and with variable surface temperature values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据