4.2 Article

Biomarkers in Scleroderma: Progressing from Association to Clinical Utility

期刊

CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11926-016-0565-0

关键词

Biomarker; Scleroderma; Systemic sclerosis; Gene microarray; Latent subtype model

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal, and Skin Diseases [AR048522.]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1418590] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scleroderma is a heterogenous disease characterized by autoimmunity, a characteristic vasculopathy, and often widely varying extents of deep organ fibrosis. Recent advances in the understanding of scleroderma's evolution have improved the ability to identify subgroups of patients with similar prognosis in order to improve risk stratification, enrich clinical trials for patients likely to benefit from specific therapies, and identify promising therapeutic targets for intervention. High-throughput technologies have recently identified fibrotic and inflammatory effectors in scleroderma that exhibit strong prognostic ability and may be tied to disease evolution. Increasingly, the use of collections of assayed circulating proteins and patterns of gene expression in tissue has replaced single-marker investigations in understanding the evolution of scleroderma and in objectively characterizing disease extent. Lastly, identification of shared patterns of disease evolution has allowed classification of patients into latent disease subtypes, which may allow rapid clinical prognostication and targeted management in both clinical and research settings. The concept of biomarkers in scleroderma is expanding to include nontraditional measures of aggregate protein signatures and disease evolution. This review examines the recent advances in biomarkers with a focus on those approaches poised to guide prospective management or themselves serve as quantitative surrogate disease outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据