4.7 Article

Phase-Locked Time-Shift Data Augmentation Method for SSVEP Brain-Computer Interfaces

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3323351

关键词

Training; Training data; Spatial filters; Calibration; Visualization; Filtering algorithms; Data models; Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs); data augmentation; phase-locked time-shift (PLTS); steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a novel augmentation method (PLTS) for SSVEP-BCI, which significantly improves the classification performance and ITR of SSVEP algorithms. This method enhances the practicality of SSVEP-based brain spellers under limited training data.
Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have achieved an information transfer rate (ITR) of over 300 bits/min, but abundant training data is required. The performance of SSVEP algorithms deteriorates greatly under limited data, and the existing time-shift data augmentation method fails to improve it because the phase-locked requirement between training samples is violated. To address this issue, this study proposes a novel augmentation method, namely phase-locked time-shift (PLTS), for SSVEP-BCI. The similarity between epochs at different time moments was evaluated, and a unique time-shift step was calculated for each class to augment additional data epochs in each trial. The results showed that the PLTS significantly improved the classification performance of SSVEP algorithms on the BETA SSVEP datasets. Moreover, under the condition of one calibration block, by slightly prolonging the calibration duration (from 48 s to 51.5 s), the ITR increased from ${40.88}\pm {4.54}$ bits/min to ${122.61}\pm {7.05}$ bits/min with the PLTS. This study provides a new perspective on augmenting data epochs for training-based SSVEP-BCI, promotes the classification accuracy and ITR under limited training data, and thus facilitates the real-life applications of SSVEP-based brain spellers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据