4.7 Article

A study on permanent deformation and fatigue damage interaction in asphalt concrete

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 407, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133473

关键词

Permanent Deformation; Fatigue; Sequential Test; Dissipated Energy; Continuum damage; Flow Number

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental study on the interaction between permanent deformation and fatigue cracking induced by load. The study found that strain hardening significantly accelerates the fatigue damage rate, while pre-existing cracks have a marginal effect on permanent deformation. The sequential test and damage approach is an effective method for evaluating asphalt mixtures.
The dominant load-induced damages, permanent deformation (PD) and fatigue cracking (F), are traditionally predicted separately by taking temperature as a variable of departure. This paper presents an experimental study of the two damages and interaction using sequential test procedure (STP) based on 'sequential damage'. The STP is conducted in PD-F and F-PD sequences on each specimen using a creep-recovery and cyclic fatigue tests. The effect of strain hardening on fatigue cracking is studied in the PD-F sequence, and the impact of fatigue cracking on permanent deformation is explored using the F-PD sequence. First, the shear deformation in tertiary stage of creep recovery is investigated using the dissipated energy ratio criterion and a new fourth creep phase is obtained. Following the PD-F sequence, strain-hardening is found a significant accelerator of fatigue damage rate, particularly on aged and laboratory produced mixes. The fatigue tests without considering the strain-hardening effect underestimate fatigue damage rate. In the F-PD sequence, the effect of pre-existing crack (up to 40% modulus reduction) on permanent deformation is found marginal. The sequential test and damage approach is an effective way to analyze interaction between damage modes and evaluate asphalt mixtures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据