4.8 Review

Enhancing electrochemical sensing through the use of functionalized graphene composites as nanozymes

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 15, 期 41, 页码 16514-16538

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nr01998e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene-based nanozymes have the potential to replace enzymes in biosensors and offer a versatile platform for bonding with complex biochemical environments. This review provides an overview of the classification, development, and synthesis of functionalized graphene-based nanozymes for electrochemical sensor design. It also discusses their application in constructing electrochemical sensors for pollutants, drugs, and various water and food samples, as well as the challenges and potential solutions related to their use as electrocatalytic materials.
Graphene-based nanozymes possess inherent nanomaterial properties that offer not only a simple substitute for enzymes but also a versatile platform capable of bonding with complex biochemical environments. The current review discusses the replacement of enzymes in developing biosensors with nanozymes. Functionalization of graphene-based materials with various nanoparticles can enhance their nanozymatic properties. Graphene oxide functionalization has been shown to yield graphene-based nanozymes that closely mimic several natural enzymes. This review provides an overview of the classification, current state-of-the-art development, synthesis routes, and types of functionalized graphene-based nanozymes for the design of electrochemical sensors. Furthermore, it includes a summary of the application of functionalized graphene-based nanozymes for constructing electrochemical sensors for pollutants, drugs, and various water and food samples. Challenges related to nanozymes as electrocatalytic materials are discussed, along with potential solutions and approaches for addressing these shortcomings. + Different categories of artificial enzymes (nanozymes) according to the type of graphene derivative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据