4.3 Article

The effects of exercise modality and intensity on energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory response in adults with obesity and treated obstructive sleep apnoea

期刊

CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 342-351

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479972316643699

关键词

Energy expenditure; obstructive sleep apnoea; obesity; exercise; weight supported; weight unsupported

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  2. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2010-11-002] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To inform recommendations for the exercise component of a healthy lifestyle intervention for adults with obesity and treated obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), we investigated the total energy expenditure (EE) and cardiorespiratory response to weight-supported (cycling) and unsupported (walking) exercise. Individuals with treated OSA and a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) performed an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer and a treadmill to determine the peak oxygen uptake ((V) over dotO(2pk)). Participants subsequently completed two endurance tests on each modality, matched at 80% and 60% of the highest (V) over dotO(2pk) determined by the incremental tests, to intolerance. The cardiorespiratory response was measured and total EE was estimated from the (V) over dotO(2). Sixteen participants completed all six tests: mean [SD] age 57 [13] years and median [IQ range] BMI 33.3 [30.8-35.3] kg/m(2). Total EE during treadmill walking was greater than cycling at both high (158 [101] vs. 29 [15] kcal; p < 0.001) and moderate (178 [100] vs. 85 [59] kcal; p = 0.002) intensities, respectively, with similar cardiorespiratory responses and pattern of EE during rest, exercise and recovery. Contrary to current guidelines, walking might be the preferred training modality to achieve the combination of weight loss and increased cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with obesity and treated OSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据