4.5 Article

Parent knowledge regarding food selection for children with PKU : Results of a survey in the United States

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112201

关键词

Phenylketonuria; Diet; Dietary knowledge; Caregiver; Phe levels

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to assess the level of parental or caregiver knowledge regarding nutritional selection for children with PKU and identify influencing factors.
Objectives: Dietary treatment is the main therapy for most patients with phenylketonuria (PKU). Parental knowledge regarding food selection is crucial to ensure adequate metabolic control and brain development during childhood and to promote lifelong adherence and healthy dietary behavior in the offspring. The aims of this study were to assess whether parental or caregiver knowledge regarding nutritional selection for children with PKU is in accordance with medical recommendations and to evaluate factors that influence their level of knowledge.Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study. An online or paper survey (N = 178) was distributed throughout the United States. The survey included a validated food selection questionnaire to assess whether the respondent adequately identified foods that require certain restrictions versus foods that can be consumed freely by an individual with PKU.Results: General knowledge of food selection among the caregivers was very high or high in nearly 60% (60-98th score percentile). Participants with the lowest scores in general knowledge of the PKU diet (quartile 1) were more likely to label allowed foods incorrectly. Respondents with the highest scores (quartile 4) were more likely to label limited foods correctly but incorrectly label allowed items. Conclusion: Knowledge of restricted foods is important to avoid poor metabolic control, but knowledge of allowed foods can be just as important to allow for a diet that is diverse, palatable, and nutritionally balanced.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据