4.7 Review

Targeting Neurogenesis in Seeking Novel Treatments for Ischemic Stroke

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11102773

关键词

neurogenesis; ischemic stroke; cell therapy; rehabilitations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ischemic stroke is a significant disease that often leads to long-term disability and mortality. Limited treatments are available, which has prompted research on neurogenesis as a potential therapeutic strategy. Various treatment methods have been found to enhance neurogenesis and facilitate brain repair and functional recovery.
The interruption of cerebral blood flow leads to ischemic cell death and results in ischemic stroke. Although ischemic stroke is one of the most important causes of long-term disability and mortality, limited treatments are available for functional recovery. Therefore, extensive research has been conducted to identify novel treatments. Neurogenesis is regarded as a fundamental mechanism of neural plasticity. Therefore, therapeutic strategies targeting neurogenesis are thought to be promising. Basic research has found that therapeutic intervention including cell therapy, rehabilitation, and pharmacotherapy increased neurogenesis and was accompanied by functional recovery after ischemic stroke. In this review, we consolidated the current knowledge of the relationship between neurogenesis and treatment for ischemic stroke. It revealed that many treatments for ischemic stroke, including clinical and preclinical ones, have enhanced brain repair and functional recovery post-stroke along with neurogenesis. However, the intricate mechanisms of neurogenesis and its impact on stroke recovery remain areas of extensive research, with numerous factors and pathways involved. Understanding neurogenesis will lead to more effective stroke treatments, benefiting not only stroke patients but also those with other neurological disorders. Further research is essential to bridge the gap between preclinical discoveries and clinical implementation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据