Thermoregulatory and perceptual implications of varying torso soft armour coverage during treadmill walking in dry heat

Modular armour allows soldiers to adjust the level of coverage according to the threat level. We hypothesized that armour configurations with lower levels of torso soft armour coverage attenuate physiological and perceptual responses during exercise in the heat. Fifteen adults (5 females/10 males, 26 +/- 5 years) walked (5 km/h, 1% incline, 1h) in dry heat (38 degrees C, 20% humidity) while wearing body armour that provided; i) high coverage (HC: 0.57 +/- 0.09 m2, 18.5 +/- 0.3 kg), ii) moderate coverage (MC: 0.44 +/- 0.07 m2, 18.1 +/- 0.3 kg), iii) low coverage (LC1: 0.21 +/- 0.03 m2, 17.4 +/- 0.1 kg), or iv) low coverage with weight equalization (LC2: 0.21 +/- 0.03 m2, 18.6 +/- 0.2 kg). Core temperature (Tcore), heart rate (HR), metabolic heat production (M-W), whole-body sweat rate (WBSR), and perceptual responses were measured. M-W during exercise (629 +/- 126 W) did not differ between configurations (p = 0.30). The change in Tcore (HC: 0.88 +/- 0.37 degrees C, MC: 0.85 +/- 0.32 degrees C, LC1: 0.91 +/- 0.38 degrees C, LC2: 0.89 +/- 0.42 degrees C, p = 0.93), HR (HC: 97 +/- 14 bpm, MC: 103 +/- 16 bpm, LC1: 96 +/- 15 bpm, LC2: 97 +/- 20 bpm, p = 0.08), and WBSR (HC: 10.2 +/- 3.4 g/min, MC: 10.3 +/- 4.3 g/min, LC1: 9.9 +/- 4.7 g/min, LC2: 10.4 +/- 4.5 g/min, p = 0.84) did not differ between configurations. Perceptual responses did not differ between configurations (all p >= 0.15). Reducing torso soft armour coverage, with minimal reductions in armour load, does not reduce physiological or perceptual strain during walking in dry heat.

Automated summary

Reducing torso soft armour coverage does not reduce physiological or perceptual strain during walking in dry heat.