4.7 Article

High level of self-disclosure on SNSs facilitates cooperation: A serial mediation model of psychological distance and trust

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107976

关键词

Self -disclosure; Cooperation; Prisoner 's dilemma games; Psychological distance; Interpersonal trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-disclosure on social networking sites has been found to affect people's cooperative behavior. High levels of self-disclosure lead to increased cooperation and the inclusion of image information can moderate this effect.
In the Internet Age, self-disclosure on social networking sites (SNSs) has become a part of people's lives. Some studies have explored how it affects the feelings and attitudes of information recipients, but little research have further explored whether such feelings and attitudes lead to changes in interactive behavior, thus failing to reveal the complete interpersonal effects of this behavior. This study explores whether and how it affects a major interpersonal behavior - cooperation and its underlying psychological mechanisms through two experiments. Experiment 1 manipulated the level of self-disclosure and recorded data on the psychological distance, trust, and cooperative behavior of recipients. The results showed that when recipients received high levels of self-disclosure information, they cooperated more with disclosers than when they received low levels of self-disclosure information. This effect was generated through a series of mediating effects of psychological distance and trust. In Experiment 2, image information was attached or not attached to high and low levels of self-disclosure to test whether it moderated the effect of self-disclosure on cooperation. It was found that this information increased cooperation with individuals with high levels of self-disclosure, but did not affect cooperation with individuals with low levels of self-disclosure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据