4.2 Article

Mini-channel cooling system for solar PV Panels with hybrid magnetic nanofluid and magnetic field

期刊

RESULTS IN ENGINEERING
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101473

关键词

Non -uniform magnetic field; Heat transfer enhancement; Hybrid nanofluid; Mini -channel. PV panel cooling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of magnetic fields on heat transfer in a hybrid nanofluid. The results show that the application of a magnetic field significantly enhances heat transfer performance, with higher field strengths leading to higher friction factors. The study also demonstrates that higher magnetic field strengths mitigate the decline in heat transfer enhancement effects.
This study delves into the interplay between magnetic fields, heat transfer, and fluid behavior within a 3D minichannel. Exploring the effects of a magnetic field on a hybrid nanofluid (Fe3O4-TiO2) under varying intensities (1000-2000 Gauss) and positions. Using numerical simulations (finite volume method), key parameters like Nusselt number (Nu), Friction factor (f), and Thermal Enhancement Factor (TEF) have been analyzed to uncover how magnetic fields and nanofluids interact in complex geometries. Results showed that the application of a magnetic field significantly enhanced heat transfer performance, with a maximum Nusselt number enhancement of 230%. Moreover, it was shown that greater magnetic field intensities were associated with elevated friction factors, whereas friction factors exhibited a declining trend as Reynolds numbers increased. The thermal enhancement factor initially increased with Reynolds numbers, but declined after reaching a peak. However, higher magnetic field strengths mitigated this decline, intensifying heat transfer enhancement effects reaching a maximum of 2.18 at 2000G magnetic field. These findings provide quantitative insights into the effectiveness of magnetic fields in enhancing heat transfer in Fe3O4-TiO2 hybrid nanofluids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据