4.8 Article

Pushing the Upper Limit of Nucleophilicity Scales by Mesoionic N-Heterocyclic Olefins

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202309790

关键词

DFT Calculations; Kinetics; Mesoionic Compounds; Methyl Cation Affinities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of mesoionic, electron-rich N-heterocyclic olefins (mNHOs) derived from 1,2,3-triazole were synthesized and characterized. These mNHOs exhibited higher nucleophilicity compared to conventional NHOs and their reactivity with other acceptors could be predicted based on the obtained reactivity parameters.
A series of mesoionic, 1,2,3-triazole-derived N-heterocyclic olefins (mNHOs), which have an extraordinarily electron-rich exocyclic CC-double bond, was synthesized and spectroscopically characterized, in selected cases by X-ray crystallography. The kinetics of their reactions with arylidene malonates, ArCH=C(CO2Et)(2), which gave zwitterionic adducts, were investigated photometrically in THF at 20 degrees C. The resulting second-order rate constants k(2)(20 degrees C) correlate linearly with the reported electrophilicity parameters E of the arylidene malonates (reference electrophiles), thus providing the nucleophile-specific N and s(N) parameters of the mNHOs according to the correlation lg k(2)(20 degrees C)=s(N)(N+E). With 21<32, the mNHOs are much stronger nucleophiles than conventional NHOs. Some mNHOs even excel the reactivity of mono- and diacceptor-substituted carbanions. It is exemplarily shown that the reactivity parameters thus obtained allow to calculate the rate constants for mNHO reactions with further Michael acceptors and predict the scope of reactions with other electrophilic reaction partners including carbon dioxide, which gives zwitterionic mNHO-carboxylates. The nucleophilicity parameters N correlate linearly with a linear combination of the quantum-chemically calculated methyl cation affinities and buried volumes of mNHOs, which offers a valuable tool to tailor the reactivities of strong carbon nucleophiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据