4.6 Article

Effective electromagnetic interference shields based on cellulose nanofibers-carbon nanotubes layered composites

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 310, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128483

关键词

Cellulose nanofibers; Layered composites; Mechanical properties; EMI shielding; Polydopamine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study fabricates a layered composite material consisting of oxidized cellulose nanofibers and carbon nanotubes for the development of sustainable and high-performance EMI shielding materials. The prepared composites exhibit excellent mechanical strength and EMI shielding effectiveness, meeting commercial requirements.
The rapid development of electronic devices and communication technologies has inadvertently led to the production of significant amounts of Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and radiation, necessitating the development of sustainable, low-density, affordable, and high-performance EMI shielding materials. The present study involves fabricating a layered composite material comprising alternating substrate and conducting layer made primarily of TEMPO-mediated oxidized cellulose nanofibers (TCNF) and carbon nanotubes (CNT). For the substrate layer, TCNF is modified with optimized polydopamine and Fe3+ concentrations to produce mechanically strong film with a tensile modulus of 12.3 GPa. Furthermore, two CNT/TCNF ratios are used in the conducting film: 60% and 80%. In addition to absorption and reflection, the presence of TCNF in the conducting layer creates an impedance mismatch, resulting in a zigzag reflection mechanism for EMI losses. For a thickness of 212 mu m, the 5-layered composite exhibited a notable tensile strength of 58 MPa and an efficient EMI shielding effectiveness (EMI SE) of 39 dB in X-band. The prepared composites meet the requirements for a commercial EMI shielding material, namely >20 dB, and outperform the mechanical strength of many other EMI shielding materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据