4.7 Article

Robust KOH-thiourea-graphene oxide cross-linked membranes for desalination

期刊

DESALINATION
卷 568, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2023.117019

关键词

Graphene oxide membrane; Cross-linking; Cation -pi interactions; Interlayer spacing; Desalination

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a new GO membrane structure, TU-GO-KOH membrane, was proposed, which has high water permeance and rejection, and exhibits good stability under long-term and high pressure conditions. The membrane remains stable even under harsh conditions, contributing to sustainable water treatment.
Due to the well-defined two-dimensional nanochannel nanostructures, graphene oxide (GO) membranes hold huge possibilities for sustainable brackish water desalination and wastewater purification. However, achieving effective nanofiltration performance and sufficient structural stability of GO membranes in aqueous environments remains a major obstacle. Herein, the TU-GO-KOH membrane -the GO membrane cross-linked by thiourea (TU) after KOH treatment, was prepared for achieving relatively high water permeance (similar to 14.2 Lm(- 2) h(-1)) and high rejection (similar to 86.3 %) for NaCl rejection. These performances exceeded the nanofiltration performances of most GO-based membranes and commercial membranes reported in the literature. More importantly, the TUGO-KOH membrane exhibited excellent separation stability over long-term (for 168 h) and under high pressures (up to 9 bar). Furthermore, even under ultra-sonication treatment and after long-term immersion in solutions with harsh pH values, the TU-GO-KOH membrane still maintained its own stability, which holds considerable promise for sustainable water treatment under harsh conditions. Additionally, the TU-GO-KOH membrane also showed enhanced mechanical properties. Overall, the superior desalination performance and notable stability of the TU-GO-KOH membrane make it a highly promising candidate for practical desalination and wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据