4.6 Article

Electrochemically enhanced peroxidase-like activity of nanohybrids for rapid and sensitive detection of H2O2 and Dopamine

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132576

关键词

Carbon quantum dots; Gold nanoparticles; Nanozyme; Dopamine; Colorimetric assay; Electrochemical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a novel approach for the synthesis of carbon quantum dot-gold nanoparticles and demonstrates the enhancement of their catalytic activity through electrochemical means. The method enables rapid and sensitive detection in field applications and can be utilized to improve and exploit enzymatically dependent reactions.
Longer detection times and low sensitivities are the two main drawbacks of applying colorimetric detection methods in field applications where rapid and sensitive detection is required. A discovery of the enhancement of nanozymatic activity via electrochemical means which significantly reduces the analyte detection time and enables ultra-low detection levels has been reported in this paper. A novel, simple and facile approach for the synthesis of carbon quantum dot-gold nanoparticles (CQD-AuNPs) has been developed. The CQD-AuNPs show-cased catalytic activity through the oxidation of 3,3 ',5,5 '-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and followed the characteristic Michaelis-Menten equation. Surprisingly, the catalytic activity of CQD-AuNPs nanohybrids enhanced considerably while the reaction was completed under an electrochemical process and assisted the detection of H2O2 and Dopamine (DA) with a limit of detection (LOD) value of 240 nM, and 0.75 mu M, respectively. Most importantly, the detection time decreased by 60-fold compared to conventional nanozymatic reactions. The work covered in this paper provides a novel approach to develop the nanocomposite and a new detection technique that can be utilized across various fields of science and engineering to improve and exploit enzymatically dependent reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据