4.6 Article

Impact of Gender and Underrepresented in Medicine Status on Research Productivity Among Ophthalmology Residency Applicants

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.07.018

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate the research productivity of ophthalmology residency applicants and identify differences in productivity based on gender and race. The findings reveal that women have similar or higher research outputs compared to men, while self-identified underrepresented in medicine (URiM) students have lower research outputs in ophthalmology. Therefore, greater mentorship and support for URiM students are needed to promote the recruitment of diverse trainees in ophthalmology programs.
center dot PURPOSE: Insufficient representation of women and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) students remains a problem among the ophthalmology workforce. In the residency selection process, research productivity is an important factor. We aimed to determine the average research output listed by applicants and assess for differences by gender and race.center dot DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.center dot METHODS: All San Francisco Match applications to the Wilmer Eye Institute for the 2019, 2020, and 2021 ophthalmology residency cycles were retrospectively reviewed. Each applicant's number of published research articles was recorded and subclassified into first-author publications in any field, publications in ophthalmology, and first-author publications in ophthalmology. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with successful publication.center dot RESULTS: A total of 1376 applications were reviewed. On average, women had a greater number of publications in ophthalmology (2.08 vs 1.73, P = .05) and presentations (4.52 vs 4.09, P = .01) compared with men. Selfidentified URiMs were less likely to list publications in ophthalmology (odds ratio [OR] 0.650, P = .05) and first-author publications in ophthalmology (OR 0.570, P = .02) compared to non-URiMs.center dot CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight disparities in research productivity by self-identified URiM status. On the other hand, women had similar if not higher research outputs than men. Greater research mentorship and opportunities to support URiM students may facilitate the recruitment of diverse trainees to ophthalmology programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据