4.5 Review

Comparative effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions for urinary incontinence in older women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105214

关键词

Nonsurgical interventions; Urinary incontinence; Older women; Systematic review; Network meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine is the most effective intervention for the management of urinary incontinence in older women.
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of existing nonsurgical interventions to improve or cure urinary incontinence in older women.Methods: Five English databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library) were searched from January 1, 2018, until August 27, 2023. Studies published before 2018 were directly extracted from a review published in 2019 on a similar research question. Three Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and SinoMed) were searched from January 1, 2000, until August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of nonsurgical interventions for women aged >= 60 years with urinary incontinence were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of improvement and cure. Pairwise meta analysis and network meta-analysis were performed, with the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) being reported.Results: There were 15 intervention categories among the included 32 randomized controlled trials for older women with urinary incontinence. The combination of behavioral therapy with other interventions, including Chinese herbal medicine, electrical stimulation, and acupuncture were effective for both improvement and cure rates. Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine was the most effective intervention category for both improvement and cure rates.Conclusion: Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine was currently the optimal selection for the management of older women with urinary incontinence. However, the clinicians should carefully consider the effectiveness and quality of evidence because of the limited quality and quantity of the randomized controlled trials included.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据