4.6 Article

Case report: De novo variant of SETD1A causes infantile epileptic spasms syndrome

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1278035

关键词

SETD1A gene; infantile epileptic spasms syndrome; whole exome sequencing; case report; review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common epileptic encephalopathy of infancy characterized by epileptic spasms, hypsarrhythmia, and developmental delay. Genetic factors, including mutations in the SETD1A gene, play a significant role in the development of IESS. This study reports a case of IESS caused by a de novo mutation in exon 12 of the SETD1A gene and provides a summary of the existing literature on SETD1A gene-related epilepsy.
Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is one of the most common epileptic encephalopathies of infancy, with typical clinical features defined by a triad of epileptic spasms, hypsarrhythmia, and developmental delay. Genetic factors are important causes of IESS. The SETD1A (SET Domain Containing 1A) gene encodes a histone lysine methyltransferase that activates gene transcription through histone H3 lysine K4 methylation. Mutations in the SETD1A gene have been associated with schizophrenia, and some have been reported to cause seizures. Herein, we report a case of IESS caused by a SETD1A gene mutation. Video electroencephalography showed hypsarrhythmia. No specific findings were obtained after brain MRI and metabolic work-up. The seizures disappeared after treatment with adrenocorticotropic hormone, vitamin B6, and valproic acid during hospitalization. Genetic testing revealed that the child had a variant (NM_014712.3:c.3005_3,006 delAG, p.Glu1002Glyfs*20) in exon 12 of the SETD1A gene, representing a de novo mutation. There have been no previous reports on the SETD1A gene causing infantile spasms. We also summarize the existing literature on SETD1A gene-related epilepsy to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据