4.7 Review

Recent strategies for the remediation of Ivermectin from the environment: A critical review

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104334

关键词

Ivermectin; Trace organic chemicals; Pollution; Adsorption; Photocatalysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the remediation strategies of Ivermectin (IVM), with adsorption being the most widely adopted technique. Various adsorbents and their performance for IVM adsorption are discussed. Additionally, the use of photocatalytic techniques for mineralizing IVM is highlighted.
Ivermectin (IVM) is arguably one of the most widely consumed drugs due to its wide range of applications for various diseases such as viruses, cancer, parasites, and inflammation. Originally designed as an antiparasitic drug, preclinical studies have shown its potential as a possible antiviral drug for COVID-19. Since the pandemic began, there has been a rise in the consumption of IVM. A consequential effect of this is the release of IVM into the environment, resulting in ecological degradation. A significant number of reviews have reported the fate, distribution, and ecotoxicity of IVM. However, reviews on the remediation strategies of IVM have been grossly ignored. Hence, this review highlights the remediation strategies of IVM reported in the literature. Findings revealed adsorption as the most broadly adopted technique for IVM remediation. The various adsorbents employed so far for the adsorption of IVM are reported. Also, the adsorption kinetics, isotherms, thermodynamics modeling, mechanistic interaction, and reusability of the investigated adsorbents were discussed. Moreover, the application of a photocatalytic technique which has the potential for mineralizing IVM was also highlighted. Lastly, to foster the removal of IVM, further research needs to address cost-effectiveness, scalability potential, computational studies, risk-benefit analysis, and socio-economic aspects of remediation techniques to close the gaps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据