4.7 Article

Determination of tin in geological materials using LA-ICP-MS: Seemingly simple analysis?

期刊

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
卷 641, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2023.121775

关键词

Tin; Memory effect; Spectral and non-spectral interferences; Homogeneity of standards; LA-ICP-MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) is a unique technique used for in situ analysis of solid samples. This paper reviews the analysis of tin in geological samples and summarizes the limitations that may cause inaccurate outcomes. The experimental results demonstrate the extent of cross-contamination caused by material ablation and the impact of contamination on background progress.
Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry is a unique technique designated for in situ analysis of a wide variety of solid samples. Nowadays, LA-ICP-MS is almost routinely used to study chemical and isotopic composition of geological materials. This paper reviews our experience with the analysis of tin in geological samples and comprehensively summarizes the limitations that may lead to inaccurate and imprecise outcomes. Experimental results show the extent of cross-contamination given by the ablation of materials containing tenths and tens of %m/m of Sn, and elucidate the impact of contamination on a background progress. Moreover, an analysis is also jeopardized by the occurrence of doubly charged ions of uranium as well as by the matrix effect amplified with operating conditions. Finally, the inhomogeneity of NIST SRM 614 is highlighted via 2D mapping especially within the rim area where tin content reaches up to 8 mg kg- 1. Furthermore, a real quartz sample is subjected to LA-ICP-MS analysis to demonstrate the manifestation of discussed negative effects. The true tin content in quartz sample and NIST 614 is verified via GF-AAS. The result of NIST 614 bulk analysis is in a good agreement with GeoReM value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据