4.6 Article

Excess and excited-state dipole moments of real-life dyes: a comparison between wave-function, BSE/GW, and TD-DFT values

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 25, 期 43, 页码 29993-30004

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp04467j

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the accuracy of BSE/evGW method for the calculation of excited state and excess dipole moments in organic dyes is assessed and compared with other methods. The results demonstrate that BSE/evGW method exhibits higher accuracy in calculating excess dipole moments of dyes and outperforms other methods in certain cases.
In this work, we assess the accuracy of the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) many-body Green's function formalism, adopting the eigenvalue-self-consistent evGW exchange-correlation kernel, for the calculation of the excited-state (mu(ES)) and excess dipole moments (Delta mu), the latter ones being the changes of dipole amplitude between the ground and excited states (ES), in organic dyes. We compare the results obtained with wave-function methods [ADC(2), CC2, and CCSD], time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT), and BSE/evGW levels of theory. First, we compute the evolution of the dipole moments of the two lowest singlet excited states of 4-(dimethylamino)benzonitrile (DMABN) upon twisting of the amino group. Next, we use a set of 25 dyes having ES characters ranging from locally excited to charge transfer to determine both mu(ES) and Delta mu. For DMABN our results show that BSE/evGW provides Delta mu values closer to the CCSD reference and more consistent trends than TD-DFT. Moreover, a statistical analysis of both Delta mu and mu(ES) for the set of 25 dyes shows that the BSE/evGW accuracy is comparable or sometimes slightly better than that of TD-M06-2X and TD-CAM-B3LYP, BSE/evGW outperforming TD-DFT in challenging cases (zwitterionic and cyanine transitions). Finally, the starting point dependency of BSE/evGW seems to be larger for Delta mu, ES dipoles, and oscillator strengths than for transition energies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据