4.6 Article

Comparative assessment of the effect of ultrasound treatment on protein functionality pre- and post-emulsification

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.07.065

关键词

Milk protein isolate; Pea protein isolate; Ultrasound; Submicron emulsion; Emulsifying performance

资金

  1. Kerry Group
  2. EPSRC [EP/L015153/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of ultrasound treatment (similar to 34W cm(-2) for 2 min) on unadsorbed and adsorbed milk protein isolate (MPI) and pea protein isolate (PPI) was investigated in terms of the ability to form and stabilise emulsion droplets. Submicron emulsions were prepared using a microfluidiser with a single pass at 100 MPa with untreated proteins (control), proteins ultrasound treated prior to pre-emulsification (unadsorbed) or proteins sonicated post pre-emulsification (adsorbed). Emulsions were also prepared with a low molecular weight surfactant, Tween 80, for comparative purposes. Ultrasound treatment reduced the size of both MPI and PPI to the nanoscale (similar to 150 nm) from micron sized aggregates (similar to 20 mu m). Emulsions prepared with ultrasound treated post pre-emulsification MPI yielded significantly smaller emulsion droplet sizes than those prepared with untreated or unadsorbed MPI. This behaviour is ascribed to rearrangement of interfacial protein allowing for the formation of smaller emulsion droplets. In contrast, emulsions produced with PPI yielded no significant differences, regardless of treatment, in emulsion droplet size, this was attributed to the more highly structured nature of PPI in contrast to MPI. Nevertheless, emulsions prepared with ultrasound treated PPI, both unadsorbed and adsorbed, yielded significantly more stable emulsion droplets than untreated PPI. This behaviour is associated with an enhanced interfacial layer and greater electrostatic repulsive forces as observed by an increased zeta-potential. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据