4.3 Article

Crosslinking for post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis corneal ectasia: Transepithelial flap-on 30 minute and flap-lift 4 minute protocol

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 1894-1898

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2633_22

关键词

Crosslinking; ectasia; LASIK; treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trans-epithelial collagen crosslinking can effectively halt disease progression in post-LASIK corneal ectasia. We recommend the use of the flap-on surgical technique for these cases.
Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) for management of corneal ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods: CXL was performed on 18 eyes of 16 patients either with LASIK flap lift (n = 9; 365 nm, 30 mW/cm(2), 4 minutes, pulse) or with transepithelial flap-on (n = 9 eyes; 365 nm, 3 mW/cm(2), 30 minutes) technique. Postoperative change in maximum keratometry (Kmax), anterior elevation, posterior elevation, spherical equivalent (SE), logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), aberrations, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 18 eyes of 16 patients (11 males, 5 females) were included. Overall, Kmax flattened more after flap-on CXL (P = 0.014) compared to flap-lift CXL. The endothelial cell density and posterior elevation were stable throughout the follow-up period. Index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), keratoconus index (KI), and central keratoconus index (CKI) decreased after flap-on CXL at 12 months, postoperatively (P < 0.05), whereas there were no statistically significant changes in these parameters after flap-off CXL group. The spherical aberrations and total root mean square decreased after flap-lift CXL at 12 months, postoperatively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In our study, transepithelial collagen crosslinking was successfully used to halt disease progression in post-LASIK keratectasia. We recommend flap-on surgical technique for these cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据