4.5 Article

Design, synthesis and bioevaluation of novel trifluoromethylquinoline derivatives as tubulin polymerization inhibitors

期刊

FUTURE MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 15, 期 21, 页码 1967-1986

出版社

Newlands Press Ltd
DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2023-0151

关键词

antiproliferative activity; antitumor; molecular docking; trifluoromethylquinoline derivatives; tubulin polymerization inhibitors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel trifluoromethylquinoline derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their antitumor activities. Compound 6b was found to exhibit remarkable antiproliferative activities across multiple cell lines, potentially inhibiting tubulin polymerization through targeting the colchicine binding site. Docking studies confirmed the binding of compound 6b to the colchicine binding site.
Aim: A series of novel trifluoromethylquinoline derivatives were designed, synthesized and evaluated for antitumor activities. Methodology: All compounds were evaluated for antiproliferative activity against four human cancer cell lines. Results: Among them, 5a, 5m, 5o and 6b exhibited remarkable antiproliferative activities against all the tested cell lines at nanomolar concentrations. Mechanism of action studies demonstrated that 6b targeted the colchicine binding site, potentially inhibiting tubulin polymerization, and further studies indicated that 6b could arrest LNCaP cells in the G2/M phase and induce cell apoptosis. Molecular docking confirmed that 6b could bind to the colchicine binding site. Conclusion: Results suggested that 6b could serve as a promising lead compound for the development of novel tubulin polymerization inhibitors and cancer therapy. I am very sorry for that we made a mistake in the above Graphical abstract that the N atom of quinoline ring is missing in the structure of the compound 6b. It is still not be corrected, could you please correct it for us by replacing the CH with N in the structure of the compound 6b. !!!!! When you finished the corrections please delete this paragraph.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据