4.7 Article

Assessment of habitat suitability in riverine wetland using genetical and physiological analysis of anurans (Pelophylax nigromaculatus)

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111144

关键词

Amphibian; Conservation genetics; Conservation physiology; Habitats status

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Habitat suitability assessments are important for ecosystem management. This study analyzed the genetic and physiological characteristics of frog populations in riverine wetlands. The results showed unexpected genetic diversity and differences in genetic structure between populations in different areas. Most physiological indicators were not significantly different, but some blood biochemical indicators indicated hepatic stress in frogs from protected lowlands. Enhancing habitat connectivity is recommended to address the issue of genetic isolation.
Habitat suitability assessments are crucial for effective ecosystem management. We conducted genetic and physiological analyses of frog populations to assess the suitability of habitats in riverine wetlands, and compared populations in riverside areas between water channels and river levees, and protected lowlands between river levees and human living spaces. Our results showed unexpected genetic diversity in the riverside population but revealed differences in genetic structure between the two groups. Most physiological indicators were not significantly different, although some blood biochemical indicators revealed hepatic stress in frogs from the protected lowlands. The study suggests that frogs from riverside areas are not necessarily worse in terms of population size or health but may be genetically isolated due to levees. To address this issue, enhancing habitat connectivity is recommended. This study demonstrated the utility of genetic and physiological information for understanding complex habitats and population conditions in the context of ecosystem management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据