4.7 Article

Analyzing the impact of various factors on leaf surface temperature based on a new tree-scale canopy energy balance model

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104994

关键词

Tree; Canopy energy balance (CEB); Regulatory mechanism; Air parameters; Solar radiation; Stomatal resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trees are effective in regulating microclimate. This paper proposes a new tree-scale canopy energy balance model to calculate leaf surface temperature and analyze the influence of various factors on temperature and energy balance. Results show that air temperature and solar radiation have a greater effect on temperature, while solar radiation has a minimal influence on energy balance.
Trees are one of the effective ways to regulate the microclimate, while the environmental parameters influence their transpiration rate. These complex processes manifest at the macro scale through leaf surface temperature (LST). Therefore, the key to studying the influence of trees on the microclimate is to calculate the LST. In this paper, we propose a new tree-scale canopy energy balance (CEB) model related to tree canopy height based on the big-leaf model to calculate the LST and analyze the influence of various factors on both LST and each subterm of CEB. The results indicate that air temperature and solar radiation have a greater effect on LST than relative humidity on it. When the total solar radiation flux remains constant, air parameters primarily affect the latent heat flux of trees through the vapor pressure deficit between leaves and the air. The transpiration rate of trees is influenced not only by air parameters, but also by stomatal resistance. Solar radiation can directly determine the magnitude of the net radiation flux in the CEB, while its influence on latent heat flux is insignificant. Under high solar radiation flux conditions, an increase in wind speed can mitigate the rise of LST.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据