4.6 Article

Design and synthesis of novel mesostructured nanohybrid materials as antimicrobials

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1295, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136611

关键词

Nano hybrid material; Mesostructured; Synthesis; Sol-gel; Anti-microbials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New transparent and monolithic silica hybrid gels with high antibacterial and antifungal activities have been synthesized. The hybrid materials have a mesoporous structure and small particle size, and show cytocompatibility with normal human skin cells.
New transparent and monolithic silica hybrid gels with high antibacterial and antifungal activities have been synthesized by soft chemistry. The synthesis has been carried out via sol-gel process, by grafting difunctional-1,3,4-thiadiazole components into a silica network, using 2,4,6,8-tetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane (TMCTS) as a silicon source. The obtained xerogels were characterized using C-13 and Si-29 CP MAS NMR, FTIR spectroscopy and SEM. The results of this study reveal that the 1,3,4-thiadiazole nuclei have been chemically cross-linked to the silica backbone structure leading to hybrid materials. The pore sizes and specific surface areas were evaluated using N-2 adsorption/desorption isotherms. The specific surface area found to be ranged from 302 to 365 m(2)center dot g(-1). Small particle size with a narrow pore size distribution and an average diameter between 2.5 and 3.5 nm characteristic of a mesoporous structure of xerogels was observed. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the xerogels were formed of spherical nanoparticles whose diameter is of around ten nanometers. Gels antimicrobial activity has been evaluated against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and the fungus Candida albicans. This study demonstrated significant biosafety of the as-synthesized products and cytocompatibility with normal human skin cells was observed, supporting their potential use as promising candidates for therapeutic application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据