4.0 Article

Upper thigh skeletal muscle index predicts outcomes in liver transplant recipients

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 219-227

出版社

KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY
DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.219

关键词

Liver transplantation; Sarcopenia; Skeletal muscle; Thigh

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study determined the optimal cut-off value for UT-SMI and found that sarcopenia diagnosed by UT-SMI is associated with outcomes in LT recipients.
Purpose: The skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the L3 level is widely used to diagnose sarcopenia. The upper thigh (UT) also reflects changes in whole-body muscle mass, but no study has examined this using the UT to diagnose sarcopenia in liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to determine an optimal cut-off value for UT-SMI and investigate how sarcopenia diagnosed by UT-SMI correlates with outcomes in LT recipients.Methods: In this retrospective study of 332 LT patients from 2018 to 2020, we investigated the association between sarcopenia diagnosed by UT-SMI and patient outcomes after LT.Results: The cut-off values for UT-SMI were 38.3 cm2/m2 for females (area under the curve [AUC], 0.927; P < 0.001) and 46.7 cm2/m2 for males (AUC, 0.898; P < 0.001). The prevalence of sarcopenia diagnosed by UT-SMI was 33.4% in our cohort. Patient and graft survival rates in the UT-SMI sarcopenia group were significantly poorer than those in the UT-SMI non-sarcopenia group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). UT-SMI was an independent prognostic factor for patient survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.182; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.183-4.025; P = 0.012) and graft survival (HR, 2.227; 95% CI, 1.054-4704; P = 0.036) in our multivariable Cox analysis.Conclusion: We confirmed that sarcopenia diagnosed by UT-SMI is associated with outcomes in LT recipients. In addition, UT-SMI was identified as an independent prognostic factor for patient survival and graft survival. Therefore, UT-SMI could be a good option for CT-based evaluations of sarcopenia in LT recipients.[Ann Surg Treat Res 2023;105(4):219-227]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据