4.6 Article

Ostwald ripening mechanism-derived MnOOH induces lattice oxygen escape for efficient aqueous MnO2-Zn batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 11, 期 44, 页码 24311-24320

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ta05364d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aqueous rechargeable MnO2-Zn batteries have high security, low cost and environmentally friendly nature. However, the slow reaction kinetics and the poor cycle life of MnO2 cathode materials limit their practical application. In this study, oxygen-defect-rich β-MnO2(O-d) nanorods were successfully prepared, and the oxygen defects were found to improve the electrical conductivity and proton adsorption capability. The tested Zn//β-MnO2(O-d) batteries exhibited impressive specific capacity and capacity retention rate.
Aqueous rechargeable MnO2-Zn batteries have attracted much attention in recent years due to their high security, low cost and environmentally friendly nature. Nevertheless, the practical application of MnO2 cathode materials is limited by the slow reaction kinetics during cycling and the poor cycle life caused by the disproportionation reaction of Mn. Here, we innovatively prepared MnOOH intermediates via the Ostwald ripening mechanism, followed by thermal treatment to induce lattice oxygen escape to finally obtain oxygen-defect-rich beta-MnO2(O-d) nanorods. First-principles calculations have shown that the oxygen defects can serve as p-type dopants to yield better electrical conductivity and enhance the adsorption capability of beta-MnO2 for protons. The tested Zn//beta-MnO2(O-d) batteries demonstrated an impressive specific capacity of 330.9 mA h g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1). After 800 charge-discharge cycles at 1 A g(-1), they maintained a capacity of 171 mA h g(-1) with a capacity retention rate of 88.9%. This work offers fascinating prospects for the creation of MnO2 with oxygen-defects and provides distinct insights towards achieving high efficiency, more productive aqueous zinc ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据