4.5 Article

Advances in lasers for the minimally invasive treatment of upper and lower urinary tract conditions: a systematic review

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04669-5

关键词

Laser; Kidney calculi; Ureteroscopy; PCNL; HoLEP; BPH; TFL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of lasers in urology has expanded to various areas including stone lithotripsy, prostate surgery, and tumor ablation. This systematic review summarizes the recent advances in laser technology and its applications in urological endoscopic treatment.
PurposeTechnological advancements in laser lithotripsy are expanding into numerous fields of urology, like ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and benign and malignant soft-tissue treatments. Since the amount of research regarding lasers in urology has grown exponentially, we present a systematic review of the most recent and relevant advances encompassing all lasers used in urological endoscopic treatment.MethodsWe performed a literature search using PubMed (May 2023) to obtain information about lasers for urological purposes. We included only recent data from published articles between 2021 and 2023 or articles ahead of print.ResultsLasers are widely used in lithotripsy for ureteric, renal, and bladder stones, benign prostate surgery, and bladder and upper tract tumor ablation. While the holmium (Ho:YAG) laser is still predominant, there seems to be more emphasis on pulse modulation and newer lasers such as thulium fiber laser (TFL) and pulsed Tm:YAG laser.ConclusionThe use of lasers and related technological innovations have shown increasing versatility, and over time have proven to be invaluable in the management of stone lithotripsy, treatment of benign and malignant prostate diseases, and urothelial tumors. Laser endoscopic treatment is heavily based on technological nuances, and it is essential to know at least the basics of these technologies. Ultimately the choice of laser used depends on its availability, cost, surgeon experience and expertise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据