4.6 Article

Topological visualization and graph analysis of rough sets via neighborhoods: A medical application using human heart data

期刊

AIMS MATHEMATICS
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 26945-26967

出版社

AMER INST MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES-AIMS
DOI: 10.3934/math.20231379

关键词

topology; neighborhood systems; rough set theory; graph theory; human heart

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the field of medical applications, graph theory offers diverse topological models for representing the human heart. This paper introduces the novel 1-neighborhood system (1-NS) tools, enabling rough set generalization and a heart topological graph model. Multiple topologies are constructed and examined using these systems, showcasing innovative topological spaces through a human heart's vertex network.
In the field of medical applications, graph theory offers diverse topological models for representing the human heart. The key challenge is identifying the optimal structure as an effective diagnostic model. This paper explains the rationale behind using topological visualization, graph analysis, and rough sets via neighborhood systems. We introduce the novel 1-neighborhood system (1-NS) tools, enabling rough set generalization and a heart topological graph model. Exploring minimal and core minimal neighborhoods, vital for classifying subsets and accuracy computation, these approaches outperform existing methods while preserving Pawlak's properties. Multiple topologies are constructed and examined using these systems. The paper presents a real-world example showcasing innovative topological spaces through a human heart's vertex network. These spaces enhance understanding of the heart's structural organization. Two algorithms are introduced for decision-making and generating graph topologies, defining unique spaces. Beyond graph theory, these techniques apply to medical contexts like blood circulation and geographical scenarios such as community street mapping. Implemented using MATLAB, they are valuable tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据