4.6 Article

Emulsion phase inversion from oil-in-water (1) to water-in-oil to oil-in-water (2) induced by in situ surface activation of CaCO3 nanoparticles via adsorption of sodium stearate

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.043

关键词

CaCO3 nanoparticles; White oil; Sodium stearate; Absorption; In situ surface activation; Double phase inversion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the oil exploitation process, the conversion from water-in-oil emulsion to oil-in-water emulsion is usually needed for a better cementing quality after using the water-in-oil emulsion drilling fluid. Due to the advantages of both oil-external properties for drilling and water-external characteristics for completion, the reversible emulsion drilling fluids are being used in drilling industry. The researches about phase inversion of emulsion induced by nanoparticles and amphiphilic compounds are also being conducted. Using white oil-water system, emulsion stabilized by CaCO3 nanoparticles and sodium stearate was investigated. The raw CaCO3 nanoparticles were activated in situ by interaction with sodium stearate in aqueous solution. The mechanism of the in situ surface activation was accessed by means of emulsion characterization, adsorption measurement and contact angle. The results show that raw CaCO3 nanopartides can be activated in situ as emulsifiers by interaction with sodium stearate. With the monolayer and bilayer formed at the CaCO3 nanoparticles-water surface by absorption of different concentrations of sodium stearate, the wettability of the particles will transform from hydrophilicity to hydrophobicity and then back to hydrophilicity. The change of wettability may induce a phase inversion of emulsions from oil-in-water O/W (1) to water-in-oil W/O and re-invert to oil-in-water O/W (2). CaCO3 nanoparticles can thus be used as good stabilizers of both O/W and W/O emulsions once activated in situ by mixing with suitable amounts of sodium stearate. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据